Pricing
Sign in / Sign up
Solutions · Engineering

The work that never reaches the top of the queue.

The agent works on a real cloud computer: it reproduces the bug, writes the fix, runs the tests, and opens a change request from a branch. You review a diff.

Get startedSee pricing
fix/retry-backoff-jitter · retry backoff jitter2 files · +7 −1 · 214 tests pass
 packages/queue/src/retry.ts−const delay = base * 2 ** attempt;+// Full jitter. Without it every worker wakes on the same tick and the+// retry storm is indistinguishable from the outage that caused it.+const delay = Math.random() * base * 2 ** attempt;   packages/queue/src/retry.test.ts+test("spreads retries across the window", () => {+  const spread = sample(1_000).stddev / EXPECTED_MEAN;+  expect(spread).toBeGreaterThan(0.4);+});
Illustration. The agent pushes the fix on a branch of its own and opens the change request from it.
The handoff

The backlog you have stopped pretending you will get to.

Not the rewrites. The small, well-defined work underneath them: reproductions, dependency bumps, flaky tests, a rename across two hundred files.

  1. 01

    The bug nobody has reproduced

    It takes the report, builds the case on a cloud computer, and comes back with either a failing test or the reason it could not reproduce. A session that cannot reproduce says so. It does not invent a fix for a bug it never saw.

  2. 02

    The flaky test everyone reruns

    It runs the suite in a loop, isolates which test actually fails and how often, and finds the shared state or the timing assumption underneath. The change request carries the failure rate it measured before and after.

  3. 03

    Dependency bumps, with the build proved

    Upgrade, build, run the suite, read the changelog for the breaking notes, patch the call sites that moved. If the suite goes red it opens the change request anyway, with the failures in the description rather than a green claim.

  4. 04

    The mechanical migration across two hundred files

    One rename, one API move, one lint rule turned on — the kind of change that is trivial per file and unbearable at scale. It works file by file on a branch and lands one reviewable diff.

  5. 05

    Last night’s exceptions, grouped

    It reads the errors the day threw, clusters them by root cause rather than by message, ranks them by how many people hit them, and takes the top one all the way to a patch.

  6. 06

    Docs that have drifted from the code

    It diffs the documented behaviour against the actual behaviour and corrects the document to match the code, or flags the code as the thing that is wrong. Both are the same commit type here — everything is a file.

The output

A diff on a branch, with the suite already run.

What comes back is a diff on a branch, with the tests already run on the machine that wrote it. There is nothing new to learn how to read.

fix/retry-backoff-jitter · retry backoff jitterChange request
packages/queue/src/retry.ts
-const delay = base * 2 ** attempt;
+// Full jitter. Without it every worker wakes on the same tick and the
+// retry storm is indistinguishable from the outage that caused it.
+const delay = Math.random() * base * 2 ** attempt;
packages/queue/src/retry.test.ts
+test("spreads retries across the window", () => {
+ const spread = sample(1_000).stddev / EXPECTED_MEAN;
+ expect(spread).toBeGreaterThan(0.4);
+});
2 files · +7 −1 · 214 tests pass
Illustration. The agent pushes the fix on a branch of its own and opens the change request from it.

You review the change, not a report about it

The agent commits on the session branch and opens a change request against main. What arrives in review is a diff with a description — the same object a colleague would have opened.

It ran before you read it

The sandbox is a real Linux machine, so the agent installs, builds and runs the suite itself. A change request that arrives red says so in the description rather than claiming green.

Parallel work, one review each

Sessions run side by side on the project’s computer and share its files, so give parallel work different files, or a project of its own. Every change still reaches main as its own change request.

Where it reaches

The repo, the tracker, the thread.

Most of the work happens inside the repo the session cloned. Connectors cover the rest, and their credentials stay on our side, never inside the machine.

The repo itself
Cloned into the sandbox at session start, on a fresh branch. The agent has a shell, a filesystem and the full history — it can bisect, run the suite, and read the commit that introduced the line it is about to change.
GitHub
Read issues, comments and the state of a branch, and write back where you have allowed it. SingulaComp opens the change request itself; the connector is for everything around it.
Linear
Pull the ticket that started the session, read the acceptance criteria, and post back the change request link when the work lands. The ticket stays the source of truth for scope.
Slack
The live channel. Mention the bot in a thread and that thread becomes a session; the answer, and any file it produced, comes back into the same thread. Teams is shipped but off until your deployment turns it on.
Your own services
Point SingulaComp at an OpenAPI or Postman spec, a GraphQL endpoint, a remote MCP server, or a bare HTTP base URL. It reads the source, works out the authentication, and turns every operation into a tool the agent can call.

Easy connect covers 3,000+ apps through their OAuth screens. Anything not in that catalogue is reachable through MCP, OpenAPI, GraphQL or raw HTTP — which is usually the honest answer for an internal service, because it never had a public catalogue entry to begin with.

How it runs

Ask now, watch the ones that matter, sleep through the rest.

Three ways to start the same session. The isolation and the review path do not change with the trigger.

  1. 01On demand

    From the thread you are already in

    Describe the bug in a Slack thread, or start a session from the web app. You get a reaction on your own message rather than a bot post, and the reply lands in the same thread.

  2. 02Human-assisted

    It stops where you told it to stop

    Set an action to Ask and the run pauses at the call and waits, showing you the action and its arguments. Approve and the same call completes and the session carries on from exactly where it stopped.

  3. 03Automated

    A cron, or a signed webhook off your own alerts

    Triage the overnight exceptions at 06:00. Or wire your alerting to a signed webhook so a paging event starts a session with the incident payload already in the prompt.

Control

Nothing merges itself.

The question is not what an agent can write. It is what it can land. Here is the exact answer.

Merge is default-deny
An agent cannot merge to main. The permission exists — an admin can grant project.cr.merge — but the grant lives in singulacomp.yaml, so widening it is itself a change someone reviews. Nothing about that is a hidden default.
Approval gates are off until you set them
The shipped default is permissive: actions run unless you say otherwise. Set Ask on the ones that should pause and Block on the ones that should never happen, per action or with one pattern rule. We would rather tell you the default than let you assume the safer one.
Each project is walled off from the others
One disposable Linux machine per project, and no two projects share one. The only thing genuinely shared is the world outside — which is why the connectors, not the machine, are where reach is decided.
Connector credentials never enter the machine
The sandbox carries one project-scoped SingulaComp token and no third-party keys. The gateway decrypts the real credential server-side and attaches it to the outbound call. A runtime secret you deliberately grant is different — that one is a real environment value the agent can read, and it is meant to be.
Every tool call is written down
The gateway that resolves the credential is the same thing that writes the record: the action, the agent, the person or trigger behind the session, the outcome, and who released a held call.
How connectors are brokered

The same platform, the other teams

One project, one set of connectors, one memory that compounds. Each team writes the skills for its own work; nobody stands up a second system.

  • SalesResearch, drafts and CRM hygiene, held for your approval
  • MarketingProduction work that sounds like you, because the voice is a file
  • ProductFeedback synthesised into specs, with the evidence attached
  • FinanceThe close, the reconciliation and the variance note
  • PeopleScheduling, kits and onboarding — never the hiring decision
  • ITRunbooks that execute, and a platform that survives your review
  • Data ScienceA real machine, a real query, an analysis you can re-run
All solutions →
Humans and AI agents. One company.

Your people and your agents, in one place you own.

Start with one job and grow from there.

Get started

Free to start · No credit card required

Humans and AI agents. One company.

Product

  • Pricing

Company

  • About
  • Blog
© 2026 Singula AI Corp. SingulaComp is a product of Singula AI Corp.
  • Privacy
  • Terms